![exposure x silver efex exposure x silver efex](https://i1.wp.com/lifeafterphotoshop.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/redfilter-after.jpg)
![exposure x silver efex exposure x silver efex](https://i1.wp.com/lifeafterphotoshop.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/filmnoir-03.jpg)
I find DxO Photolab quite equivalent to Capture One. I find Capture One one of the best raw developers but the behavior of the company suggests that I should look for an alternative in the foreseeable future.
EXPOSURE X SILVER EFEX UPDATE
With the CO21 update which has angered many users and the new price increase, many users will probably think about an alternative. (However I and a great fan of Affinity, but as a complement to Capture One, not as a replacement.) I'm afraid that whenever I try other apps out of curiosity, it is Capture One that I compare them to, and generally they fall short. I've been using Capture One for some years, since version 4.1 if I remember correctly. I'm not sure what you mean by "providing you use the right format". (Not so if you end up taking the image on to do more work in Photoshop or Affinity, for instance, but you wouldn't always need to do that, perhaps?) On the other hand with Capture One, the extra space taken up by storage of edits and previews is much more modest. afphoto files for every picture is as much as double the space need for the raw alone. afphoto file which can grow to be quite large, so there is a considerable storage issue if the space needed for your raws plus your. Its "develop" persona, though, is in my opinion much more rudimentary than camera raw in Photoshop, and I think that you would be seriously disappointed in trying to use it for developing raw files, compared with Capture One.Īnother downside is that when you work on a raw file in Affinity it will create an. Affinity is a realistic alternative to Photoshop, for instance for retouching, panorama stitching, etc.